Swift shot: Colorful and dark, a new twist on the Alice tales of “Lewis Carroll”. My exposure to Alice in Wonderland is pretty slim, I saw the original Disney film when I was a kid and loved the Cheshire Cat and remember thinking Alice was a bit of a spoiled brat. But, legends change with time – Burton does a good job keeping the primary elements intact. The dynamic world of Underland, as it is supposed to be called, feels more alive than ever – but sadly the 3D effect had little to do with that phenomena and more with the powerful use of colors and characters.
Alice in Wonderland reminds us all what it is like to be yourself, reckless and free of the prohibitions placed on us by society – in a time when women were to be seen and not heard, and certainly never trusted, Alice soon finds herself torn in both reality and in Wonderland faced with the dilemma of not meeting up to everyone’s expectations of her. What is a girl to do? Even in her fantasy world she is falling short, as everyone keeps reminding her she is “the wrong Alice”.
What is it about?
The soon-to-be-twenty, Alice Kingsleigh (Mia Wasikowska) is bound for a garden party, a surprise affair set up so her secret admirer, Lord Hamish, may propose to her in front of all of their peers. Hamish, whose foppish appearance screams of Alfred E. Newman all grown up essentially commands Alice to meet him under the gazebo so that he may claim her hand. Asking isn’t something lords are accustomed to, especially not during Carroll’s day. Alice, in a panic, darts off claiming she has seen a white rabbit and must find out where it is going.
Alice is quickly brought to a rabbit hole and, despite terrible nightmares wherein she falls down into a rabbit hole, peers into it and, wouldn’t ya know it – she falls into the hole. Not too bright, this Alice. When she falls through the hole, what you should get is an amazing 3D experience, but because everything is happening so fast, you will get special effects soup, as I call it.
The human eye can only focus on so many things at once, and with her dizzying descent into the hole, objects swish by her, and you, so fast – they get lost to the eye. I imagine shedding the 3D specs might have helped. And, unless you need to see spears thrust at you later on in the movie, in a cheesy attempt to warrant 3D, just pass on the 3D stuff – I can’t emphasize that enough, as I wish I had NOT seen it in 3D at all. If anything, it will detract from your overall immersion with the story – hardly the director’s intent.
Alice is soon encountering all manner of odd creature and, of course, just about everything can talk to her – and does. She is not exactly welcomed with warmth, more apathy and suspicion that the white rabbit snagged the “wrong Alice”. Alice doesn’t really think any of this is real, so she decides she might as well enjoy her stay in this odd dream land, constantly reminding her new “friends” that they don’t exist anyway. She soon finds out how very real all of these characters are as she is relentlessly pursued by the Red Queen’s evil Knave, Stayne (played by an actor who is a blast from the past – so I won’t reveal it here).
Alice must battle with inner doubts about her principles outweighing the safety of her new friends, and she must prove to everyone that she is the right Alice. She is to be a champion for a task so impossible, that not even her deceased father, the dreamer, could have imagined it for her. But, as he used to tell her each night she woke from her little nightmares, nothing is impossible . . . certainly nothing is impossible in this Burton re-telling of Alice in Wonderland.
Why do I care?
So, why go see another Alice tale? What makes this any different or any better than the countless other Wonderlands out there? Quite simply, Tim Burton – he manages to create a masterful rendition of Alice in Wonderland using darker tones and subtle hints of the old classic Disney cartoon. The characters in Alice in Wonderland come alive due to the almost seamless special effects, whilst all the characters have something a tad “off” about them, they don’t seem unreal – more dreamlike. A lucid dream that you wake up from knowing that the characters are real and you can call them up on some sort of imagination rolodex at your leisure.
Depp and Carter both become their respective other selves in a haunting fashion, it’s what I would expect from both of them – and they don’t disappoint. Newcomer, Mia Wasikowska is simply the perfect choice for this new Alice, a bit bratty yet practical and determined to settle things her way, regardless of the expectations of others. All of the characters will leave a little something in your heart before you slip off to sleep, and you will find yourself wondering what kind of magical characters are waiting for you, in your own personal Wonderland. After all, impossible is just a word, and a dream is simply the way we defeat the impossible.
To say what I didn’t like about Alice in Wonderland would be a bit of a spoiler, so, let’s just say the end left a lot to be desired for how quickly things were assumed and wrapped up as though everyone was in Wonderland with Alice. Still, I enjoyed the story and it was a more grown-up version of the Alice I remember from all those years ago. I would highly recommend you venture down the rabbit hole and enjoy Burton’s Alice in Wonderland, today.
Swift note: We managed to steal a new writer from across the pond who already screened Alice in Wonderland for our UK audience, but I wanted to reveal them both at the same time, to give you a chance to see a Yank’s perspective vs. a Brit’s. So, please have a look at our newest member of the team, Krystal Sim’s offering of Burton’s Alice.
Amadarwin says
Finally saw it. Rates a 3 at best. It was over so quickly it didn't allow the story to breathe – it felt like I was on a Disneyland ride.
DIDOMAN says
Ahh a fellow person who agrees the 3D version is useless. The color and brightness where sacrificed for a stupid 3D effect that didn't even look 3D at all. I felt like I was watching it through a glass onion.
After watching Avatar (which was filmed specifically in 3D) this cheap attempt to jump on the 3D band wagon ruined it for me. I will be watching it again in 2D. They should have a warning on the label. "WARNING: Aftermarket 3D Effects ONLY"
Swift says
Exactly, 3D is hopefully a fad and not a wave of the future, the whole industry needs to grasp reality and stop with all the hype BS and focus on content not quantity of butts in seats.
alice in wonderland video says
Watching these generic images in 3-D – a disingenuous war against piracy that has been disguised as “immersive” and “revolutionary: – doesn’t help. What exactly is so immersive about tea cups almost hitting you in the face? At least James Cameron tried experimenting with 3-D’s depth-of-field when he made FernGully in Space. Here, the effect is so cheap and gimmicky that I kept wishing the Red Queen would cry “off with his head” and let the 3-D axe end my suffering once and for all.
Boghossian says
I saw the midnight showing of Alice In Wonderland. Although the performances were great, and the animation was really cool (I love how they did the Cheshire Cat), I was not pleased with the script. It wasn’t very developed, and it was kinda boring. I still enjoyed the movie, though.
Madison says
"AiW" gets better with each subsequent viewing. Some of the dialogue I missed during the first viewing, and things became clearer to me the second time around. I agree, pass on the 3D, it wasn't necessary. And don't believe the hype – this wasn't "The Mad Hatter in Wonderland" – yeah the Mad Hatter's role in this movie is much bigger than in the original Disney version but he wasn't "over used" if you know what I am saying. And what is it about the Tim Burton/Johnny Depp combo that makes magic happen?? Two teacups up tee hee!!! 🙂